posted on 2021-06-17, 13:13authored byBin Lu, Bo Li, Xiaolong Song, Jianxin Yang
Product lifespan is one of key factors for product life cycle environmental performance.
Lifespan extending is always considered positive for better life cycle environmental performance. From
the view of one product, extended product lifespan can mitigate the environmental performance for
avoided new production. But compared with the newer products those with same product function, there
may be a tradeoff between lifespan extending and products replacement, because generally the newer
products always have the higher energy efficiency and better function. It requires a systematic
evaluation method under these circumstances. Multi Life Cycle Assessment (MLCA) may be a potential
solution. The system boundary of MLCA is larger, including two or more life cycles of products. The
end-of-life options of products, such as components reuse and materials recovery, can be integrated
within the system boundary. In this study, MLCA was applied to two types of products, air-conditioner
and notebook computer, in China to verify its practicability. The results of MLCA indicated that lifespan
extending is better than frequent replacement for the notebook computer in the environmental
performance view, for the energy efficiency improvement of notebook improves not so fast. While the
MLCA results indicated that products replacement is better for air-conditioners, because the energy
efficiency improved fast and evidently. In conclusion, MLCA can be useful for assessment of product
lifespan extending point based on the life cycle environmental performance. Further, environmentally
friendly technology innovation as an important factor beyond the product itself should be taken into
consideration for optimal product lifespan assessment.
History
Publication
4th PLATE 2021 Virtual Conference, 26-28 May 2021;