Recently, several advances have been made in the analysis of interval
censored (IC) data mainly in relation to semi-parametric proportional hazard
(PH) models (Gómez et al., 2009, Lesaffre et al., 2005). It is arguable, however,
that the parametric case has been somewhat neglected, overall, and that more
can be learned, especially in relation to non-PH models. Accordingly, we focus on
simple parametric models for interval censored survival data arising in longitudinal RCTs. For the exponential regression model we compare the performance of
a general likelihood with commonly used proxy likelihoods, which ignore the interval censoring by treating the interval censored times to events as if they were
exact. We show analytically that use of proxy likelihoods leads to estimators
which are artificially precise and we quantify the extent of the resulting biases in
a simulation study and by analyzing real data. We also compare the likelihoods
using non-PH models and obtain different findings.
History
Publication
Proceedings of the 26th International Workshop on Statistical Modelling;