Objectives. Conventional bedside tests of visuospatial function such as the clock drawing (CDT) and intersecting
pentagons tests (IPT) are subject to considerable inconsistency in their delivery and interpretation. We compared performance
on a novel test – the letter and shape drawing (LSD) test –with these conventional tests in hospitalised elderly patients.
Methods. The LSD, IPT, CDT and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were performed in 40 acute elderly
medical inpatients at University Hospital Limerick The correlation between these tests was examined as well as the
accuracy of the visuospatial tests to identify significant cognitive impairment on the MoCA.
Results. The patients (mean age 81.0±7.71; 21 female) had a median MoCA score of 15.5 (range = 1–29). There was a
strong, positive correlation between the LSD and both the CDT (r = 0.56) and IPT (r = 0.71). The correlation between the
LSD and MoCA (r = 0.91) was greater than for the CDT and IPT (both 0.67). The LSD correlated highly with all MoCA
domains (ranging from 0.54 to 0.86) and especially for the domains of orientation (r = 0.86), attention (0.81) and
visuospatial function (r = 0.73). Two or more errors on the LSD identified 90% (26/29) of those patients with MoCA
scores of ⩽20, which was substantially higher than for the CDT (59%) and IPT (55%).
Conclusion. The LSD is a novel test of visuospatial function that is brief, readily administered and easily interpreted.
Performance correlates strongly with other tests of visuospatial ability, with favourable ability to identify patients with
significant impairment of general cognition.
Funding
Development of a structure identification methodology for nonlinear dynamic systems
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine;34, pp. 169-175
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Note
peer-reviewed
Other Funding information
HRB
Rights
Material on these pages is copyright Cambridge University Press or reproduced with permission from other copyright owners. It may be downloaded and printed for personal reference, but not otherwise copied, altered in any way or transmitted to others (unless explicitly stated otherwise) without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. Hypertext links to other Web locations are for the convenience of users and do not constitute any endorsement or authorisation by Cambridge University Press.