University of Limerick
Browse
DOCUMENT
Trubetskaya_2021_Supplementary.pdf (608.93 kB)
DOCUMENT
Trubetskaya_2021_Study.pdf (773.17 kB)
1/0
2 files

A study of emissions from domestic solid-fuel stove combustion in Ireland

journal contribution
posted on 2023-02-21, 16:42 authored by Anna TrubetskayaAnna Trubetskaya, Chunshui Lin, Jurgita Ovadnevaite, Darius Ceburnis, Colin O'Dowd, JAMES J LEAHYJAMES J LEAHY, Rory F.D. Monaghan, Robert Johnson, Peter Layden, William Smith
Solid-fuel stoves are at the heart of many homes not only in developing nations, but also in developed regions where there is significant deployment of such heating appliances. They are often operated inefficiently and in association with high emission fuels like wood. This leads to disproportionate air pollution contributions. Despite the proliferation of these appliances, an understanding of particulate matter (PM) emissions from these sources remains relatively low. Emissions from five solid fuels are quantified using a “conventional” and an Eco design stove. PM measurements are obtained using both “hot filter” sampling of the raw flue gas, and sampling of cooled, diluted flue gas using an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor and AE33 aethalometer. PM emissions factors (EF) derived from diluted flue gas incorporate light condensable organic compounds; hence they are generally higher than those obtained with “hot filter” sampling, which do not. Overall, the PM EFs ranged from 0.2 to 108.2 g GJ−1 for solid fuels. The PM EF determined for a solid fuel depends strongly on the measurement method employed and on user behavior, and less strongly on secondary air supply and stove type. Kerosene-based firelighters were found to make a disproportionately high contribution to PM emissions. Organic aerosol dominated PM composition for all fuels, constituting 50−65% of PM from bituminous and low-smoke ovoids, and 85−95% from torrefied olive stone (TOS) briquettes, sod peat, and wood logs. Torrefied biomass and low-smoke ovoids were found to yield the lowest PM emissions. Substituting these fuels for smoky coal, peat, and wood could reduce PM2.5 emissions by approximately 63%.

History

Publication

Energy & Fuels 35 (6), pp. 4966-4978

Publisher

ACS

Note

peer-reviewed

Rights

© 2021 ACS This document is the Accepted Manuscript version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in energy&fuels, copyright © American Chemical Society after peer review and technical editing by the publisher. To access the final edited and published work see https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c04148

Language

English

Department or School

  • Chemical Sciences

Usage metrics

    University of Limerick

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC