posted on 2022-01-18, 11:55authored byChiara Bellucci, Karen Hughes, Elaine C. Toomey, Paula R. Williamson, Karen Matvienko-Sikar
Background: Core outcome sets (COS) are standardised sets of outcomes, which represent the minimum
outcomes that should be measured and reported in clinical trials. COS can enhance comparability across health
trials by reducing heterogeneity of outcome measurement and reporting and potentially minimising selective
outcome reporting. Examining what researchers involved in trials know and think about COS is essential to increase
awareness and promote COS uptake. The aim of this study is therefore to examine clinical trialists’ knowledge,
perceptions and experiences of COS.
Methods: An online survey design was used. Participants were clinical trialists, operationalised for the current study
as researchers named as the contact person on a trial registered on the International Standard Randomised
Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) Trial repository between 1 January 2019 and 21 July 2020. Survey items assessed
clinical trialists’ familiarity with and understanding of COS, along with experiences of COS use and development.
Results: Of 1913 clinical trialists contacted to participate, 62 (3%) completed the survey. Forty (65%) participants
were familiar with COS and, of those familiar with COS, 21 (55%) had been involved in a trial that used a COS. Of
clinical trialists who used COS in a trial(s), less than half (n = 9, 41%) reported that all COS outcomes were used. The
main barriers to using COS are poor knowledge about COS (n = 43, 69%) and difficulties identifying relevant COS
(n = 42, 68%). Clinical trialists also reported perceptions of COS as restrictive and often containing too many
outcomes. The main enablers to using COS are clear understanding (n = 51, 82%) and perceived importance of
COS (n = 44, 71%).
Conclusions: Enhancing clinical trialists’ use of all COS outcomes is needed to reduce outcome heterogeneity and
enhance comparability across trial findings. Enhancing awareness of COS importance among researchers and
funders is needed to ensure that COS are developed and used by clinical trialists. Education and training may
further promote awareness and understanding of COS.
Funding
Development of a structure identification methodology for nonlinear dynamic systems