posted on 2020-09-16, 10:02authored byFrank M. Häge
Supranational bureaucracies are often promoted as a solution to collective action problems. In
the European Union context, investing the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and
Security Policy (HR) with new agenda-setting powers was expected to improve the coherence,
continuity, and efficiency of foreign policy-making. Relying on novel fine-grained and
comprehensive data about the content and duration of working party meetings, the study maps
and analyses the allocation of political attention to different foreign policy issues between 2001
and 2014. The results show that the empowerment of the HR by the Lisbon Treaty had little
immediate effect on the Council’s foreign policy agenda. However, the study also indicates
that this result might be due to a lack of capability and ambition rather than weak institutional
prerogatives.