University of Limerick
Browse
Morley_2020_Balancing.pdf (258.25 kB)

Balancing rigour and relevance: The case for methodological pragmatism in conducting large-scale, multi-country and comparative management studies

Download (258.25 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2020-05-11, 09:22 authored by Emma Parry, Elaine Farndale, Chris Brewster, MICHAEL MORLEYMICHAEL MORLEY
Collecting large-scale comparative management data from multiple countries poses challenges in demonstrating methodological rigour, including the need for representativeness. We examine the rigour of sample representativeness, the counterbalancing effect of sample relevance, and explore sampling options, equivalence across countries, data collection procedures and response rates. We identify the challenges posed by cross-national survey data collection, and suggest that the ideal research designs presented in much of the literature might not be practical or desirable in large-scale, multi-time-point, cross-national comparative management studies because of the need to ensure relevance across such contexts. Using the example of Cranet – a large-scale, multi-time-point, cross-national survey of human resource management – we offer suggested solutions for balancing both rigour and relevance in research of this nature

History

Publication

British Journal of Management;1-10

Publisher

Wiley & Sons

Note

peer-reviewed

Language

English

Usage metrics

    University of Limerick

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC