With the maturation of strategic human resource management scholarship, there
appears to be a greater call to move from monolithic workforce management to a
more strategic and differentiated emphasis on employees with the greatest capacity
to enhance competitive advantage. There has been little consideration in the literature
as to whether organizations formally identify key groups of employees based
on their impact on organizational learning and core competences. Using survey evidence
from 260 multinational companies (MNCs), this paper explores the extent to
which key groups of employees are formally recognized and whether they are subject
to differential compensation practices. The results demonstrate that just in
excess of half of these MNCs identify a key group. There was considerable differentiation
in the compensation practices between these key groups, managers and the
largest occupational group in the workforce. The results give rise to questions worthy
of future investigation, namely whether the differentiated approaches used lead
to improved performance outcomes.
History
Publisher
Taylor and Francis
Note
peer-reviewed
Rights
This is an Author's Original Manuscript of an article whose final and definitive form, the Version of Record, has been published in The International Journal of Human Resource Management 2016 copyright Taylor & Francis, available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1075571