University of Limerick
Browse

Characterization of adrenocortical tumors by 18F-FDG PET/CT: does steroid hormone hypersecretion status modify the uptake pattern?

Download (1.36 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2018-05-14, 14:04 authored by Nunzia Cinzia Paladino, Carole Guérin, Aoife J. Lowery, Andrea Attard, Wassim Essamet, Eveline Slotema, Isabelle Morange, Frédéric Castinetti, Thierry Brue, Anderson Loundou, David Taïeb, Frédéric Sebag
Background adrenal tumor-to-liver uptake value (Tmx:Lmx) on 18F-FDG PET/CT is an accurate and reproducible PET parameter in the distinction between benign and malignant adrenal masses. The potential impact of steroid hormone secretion on 18F-FDG uptake is still debatable. The aim of this study was to evaluate this relationship. Methods 2010–2015: 73 patients who underwent adrenalectomy for adrenocortical tumors [49 secreting/(SA) and 24 non-secreting/(NSA)] were retrospectively included in the study. Fourteen were malignant. All patients underwent hormonal evaluation, functional and anatomical imaging, Weiss scoring and Ki 67 evaluation. Results malignant tumors exhibit higher SUVmax than benign tumors (median 7.75 vs 3.06 respectively, p < 0.001) and Tmx:Lmx was 2.7 vs 1.17 for benign tumors, p < 0.001. Tmx:Lmx was positively correlated to Weiss score (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed for Tmx:Lmx between SA and NSA overall (p = 0.851), regardless of the subgroup of tumors analyzed. Tmx:Lmx was not correlated to tumor size (p < 0.508) or 24 h free urinary cortisol level (p < 0.522). Conclusions no correlation was observed between Tmx:Lmx and hormonal status, however the correlation between ratio, malignancy and Weiss score confirm the utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the differentiation of benign from malignant adrenal lesions, irrespective of the hormone secretory status of the tumor. 18F-FDG PET/CT is a useful biomarker in the diagnosis of adrenal tumors, regardless of the secretion status.

History

Publication

Surgical Oncology;27 (2), pp. 231-235

Publisher

Elsevier

Note

peer-reviewed

Rights

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Surgical Oncology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Surgical Oncology, 2018, 27 (2), pp. 231-235, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2018.04.003

Language

English

Usage metrics

    University of Limerick

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC