posted on 2022-01-21, 12:49authored byIsabel Schestak, David Styles, Kirsty Black, Prysor Williams
The distillery sector is among the biggest industrial water user in the United Kingdom (UK) and simul taneously delivers valuable by-products traditionally used for cattle feed, but in recent years increasingly
for bioenergy generation. Our research provides new insight into these two aspects of alcohol produc tion by 1) presenting the first water scarcity footprint of Scottish single malt whisky, and 2) comparing
potential avoided water scarcity impacts through the use of by-products to replace different feeds and
energy carriers. We applied Life Cycle Assessment, including a water scarcity footprint (AWARE method ology) and carbon footprint, using primary data from a Scottish whisky distillery. By-products used for
feed were considered to replace imported soybean meal from the Americas or rapemeal from Europe
combined with UK grown barley to balance protein and metabolisable energy substitution. Alternative
by-product use for biogas production replaced conventional heat and electricity generation, or transport
fuel with the digestate substituting mineral fertilisers. The water scarcity footprint of 1 litre of pure al cohol is 0.79 m3 world eq., with the majority of water used for cooling, highlighting a hotspot for water
conservation. The carbon footprint is 4.4 kg CO2 eq., predominantly caused by heating with gas oil. By product use as animal feed, replacing soybean meal and barley, offsets up to 47% of the water scarcity
footprint and 32% of the carbon footprint of alcohol production. Using by-products for bioenergy gen erates smaller offsets. Water reuse and heat recovery measures should be investigated as priorities to
reduce the environmental footprint of whisky. Feeding all cereal based by-products from UK potable al cohol production to cattle could save 370 M m3 world eq., or 37% of the UK’s water scarcity footprint
attributable to imported soy feed.
History
Publication
Sustainable Production and Consumption;30, pp. 158-170