Advocates of public-private partnerships (PPPs) argue that they can deliver public infrastructure more efficiently than traditional procurement through timelier completion and superior value for money. Despite these claims comparative analysis of the performance of both procurement methods has received scant attention in the PPP literature to date. This paper addresses this issue by providing an in-depth,case-based comparison of PPP versus traditional procurement in the schools sector in Ireland. Through detailed semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders and an examination of the available documentation, we assess whether the key objectives ofusing PPP have been achieved. Overall, we find no evidence that PPP leads to faster delivery of infrastructure when the overall procurement process from contract notice to delivery is accounted for. In addition, we find only limited evidence to suggest that PPP results in better value for money.
History
Publication
Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics; 90, pp. 245-267
Publisher
Wiley and Sons Ltd
Note
peer-reviewed
Rights
This is the author version of the following article:
Comparing PPP with Traditional Procurement: The Case of Schools Procurement in
Ireland
Cian O’Shea, Dónal Palcic and Eoin Reeves
2018 Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics
which has been published in final form at
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apce.12236
This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms
and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-828039.html#terms