posted on 2023-01-09, 15:54authored byE.M. Donnellan, M.B. O'Brien, Kieran G. Meade, Sean FairSean Fair
Some bulls with apparently normal semen quality yield unacceptably low pregnancy rates. We hypothesised that a differential uterine immunological response to sperm from high and low fertility bulls may contribute to these differences. The experimental model used was heifer follicular phase uterine explants incubated with frozen-thawed sperm from high and low fertility bulls (3–5 replicates per experiment). Inflammatory gene expression of IL1A, IL1B, IL6, TNFA and CXCL8 were assessed by qPCR and IL1-β and IL-8 were quantified in explant supernatants by ELISA. Neutrophil binding affinity to sperm from high and low fertility bulls was also assessed. There was a significant up-regulation of IL1A, IL1B and TNFA from frozen-thawed sperm, irrespective of fertility status, compared to the unstimulated control. This response was confirmed at the protein level, with an increase of IL-1β and IL-8 protein concentrations by 5 and 2.7 fold, respectively (P < 0.05). Although no significant differences in the inflammatory response at the gene or protein level were evident between high and low fertility bulls, more sperm from low compared to high fertility bulls bound to neutrophils (P < 0.05). Using bulls of unknown fertility, cauda epididymal sperm (CES) plus seminal plasma (SP) upregulated IL6 (P < 0.05) but there was no upregulation of any inflammatory gene expression for CES alone. Overall, this ex vivo study demonstrated an upregulation of inflammatory gene expression in the uterus in response to frozen-thawed bull sperm. While there was no difference between sperm from high and low fertility bulls, there was a greater binding affinity of low fertility sperm by neutrophils.
Funding
Using the Cloud to Streamline the Development of Mobile Phone Apps
peer-reviewed
The full text of this article will not be available in ULIR until the embargo expires on the 20/09/2022
Other Funding information
SFI, IRC
Rights
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Theriogenology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Theriogenology Volume 176, December 2021, Pages 26-34, https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12417