In the rapidly changing environment of language learning and teaching, electronic literacies have
an increasingly important role to play. While much research on new literacies focuses on the World
Wide Web, the aim in this study is to investigate the importance of corpus consultation as a new
type of literacy which is of particular relevance in the context of language learning and teaching.
After briefly situating the theoretical and pedagogical context of the study in relation to authenticity
and learner autonomy, the paper describes an empirical study involving eight postgraduate students
of French. As part of a Masters course they write a short text and subsequently attempt to
improve it by using concordancing software to consult a small corpus containing texts on a similar
subject. The analysis of the results reveals a significant number of changes made by the learners
which may be classified as follows in order of frequency: grammatical errors (gender and agreement,
prepositions, verb forms/mood, negation and syntax); misspellings, accents and hyphens; lexico-
grammatical patterning (native language interference, choice of verb and inappropriate vocabulary);
and capitalisation. The conclusion notes that the situation in which these students found
themselves (i.e. faced with a text on which the teacher had indicated phrases which could be
improved) is replicated in many cases every day, and suggests that corpus consultation may have a
useful role to play in the context of interactive feedback, particularly in cases where traditional language
learning resources are of little use.
History
Publication
ReCALL;16 (1), pp. 158-172
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Note
peer-reviewed
Rights
Material on these pages is copyright Cambridge University Press or reproduced with permission from other copyright owners. It may be downloaded and printed for personal reference, but not otherwise copied, altered in any way or transmitted to others (unless explicitly stated otherwise) without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. Hypertext links to other Web locations are for the convenience of users and do not constitute any endorsement or authorisation by Cambridge University Press.