DE-PASS best evidence statement (BESt): determinants of adolescents’ device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour in settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background Although physical activity (PA) is associated with signifcant health benefts, only a small percentage of adolescents meet recommended PA levels. This systematic review with meta-analysis explored the modifable determinants of adolescents’ device-based PA and/or sedentary behaviour (SB), evaluated in previous interventions and examined the associations between PA/SB and these determinants in settings.
Methods A search was conducted on fve electronic databases, including papers published from January 2010 to July 2023. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) or Controlled Trials (CTs) measuring adolescents’ device-based PA/SB and their modifable determinants at least at two time points: pre- and post-intervention were considered eligible. PA/SB and determinants were the main outcomes. Modifable determinants were classifed after data extraction adopting the social-ecological perspective. Robust Bayesian meta-analyses (RoBMA) were performed per each study setting. Outcomes identifed in only one study were presented narratively. The risk of bias for each study and the certainty of the evidence for each meta-analysis were evaluated. The publication bias was also checked. PROSPERO ID: CRD42021282874.
Results Fourteen RCTs (eight in school, three in school and family, and one in the family setting) and one CT (in the school setting) were included. Fifty-four modifable determinants were identifed and were combined into 33 broader determinants (21 individual–psychological, four individual–behavioural, seven interpersonal, and one institutional). RoBMAs revealed none or negligible pooled intervention efects on PA/SB or determinants in all settings. The certainty of the evidence of the impact of interventions on outcomes ranged from very low to low. Narratively, intervention efects in favour of the experimental group were detected in school setting for the determinants: knowledge of the environment for practicing PA, d=1.84, 95%CI (1.48, 2.20), behaviour change techniques, d=0.90, 95%CI (0.09, 1.70), choice provided, d=0.70, 95%CI (0.36, 1.03), but no corresponding efects on PA or SB were found.
Conclusions Weak to minimal evidence regarding the associations between the identifed modifable determinants and adolescents’ device-based PA/SB in settings were found, probably due to intervention inefectiveness. Well?designed and well-implemented multicomponent interventions should further explore the variety of modifable determinants of adolescents’ PA/SB, including policy and environmental variables.
History
Publication
BMC Public Health, 2024, 24, 1706Publisher
BMCOther Funding information
This article is based on work from COST Action CA19101 Determinants of Physical Activities in Settings (DE-PASS), supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). The content of this article reflects only the authors’ views and the European Community is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) is a funding agency for research and innovation networks. Our Actions help connect research initiatives across Europe and enable scientists to grow their ideas by sharing them with their peers. This boosts their research, career and innovation. www.cost.eu.Also affiliated with
- Health Research Institute (HRI)
Sustainable development goals
- (3) Good Health and Well-being
External identifier
Department or School
- Physical Education and Sports Science