posted on 2017-07-03, 10:37authored byA.G. Fahey, P. Duffy, Seán Fair
Rams with strong libido and desirable
semen characteristics can provide more insemination
doses per ejaculate and produce more progeny, improving
population genetic linkage to improve the accuracy
of EBV. The objective of this study was to determine if
teasing rams, either by sight and smell alone (Exp. 1),
or physical contact (Exp. 2), could improve libido and
semen quality of rams. In Exp. 1, there were 3 treatments
in which rams were exposed to the sight and smell of
the ewe for 1 h: control treatment (n = 5) in which rams
were exposed to a ewe not in estrus; non-novel treatment
(n = 6) in which rams were exposed to a ewe in
estrus and the same ewe was used for semen collection;
and novel treatment (n = 6) in which rams were exposed
to a ewe in estrus and a different ewe in estrus was used
for semen collection. In Exp. 2, rams were individually
given full access to a ewe, which had a cotton apron
fi tted to cover her vulva, for 15 min. The 3 treatments
in Exp. 2 were: control treatment (n = 5) in which rams
were placed in a pen with a ewe not in estrus; a nonnovel
treatment (n = 5) in which rams were placed in a
pen with a ewe in estrus and the same ewe was used for
semen collection; novel treatment (n = 6) in which rams
were placed in a pen with a ewe in estrus and a different ewe in estrus was used for semen collection. Experiment
1 was repeated for 5 consecutive days and Exp. 2
was repeated for 4 consecutive days. Data on reaction
time, number of mounts, semen volume, semen concentration,
sperm wave motion, and progressive linear
motion (Exp. 1 only) were collected and analyzed as a
randomized complete block design, where rams were
initially blocked for breed and age. In Exp. 1, there was
an effect of day (P < 0.05) and a treatment × day interaction
(P < 0.05) on semen volume, whereas there was
also an effect of treatment (P < 0.05) and day (P < 0.01)
on semen concentration, which was most evident on d 1.
In Exp. 2, there was an effect of treatment on reaction
time (P < 0.05) and semen volume (P = 0.08), which
was most evident on d 1. This study demonstrates an
acute effect on d 1 on semen concentration when rams
were exposed to the sight and smell of a ewe in estrus.
Alternatively, when rams were stimulated with physical
contact of a ewe in estrus, an acute increase in semen
volume was evident on d 1. These effects were not evident
on subsequent days and thus the overall benefi ts on
ram libido and semen quality of exposing rams to ewes
in estrus are minimal.