University of Limerick
Browse

Identifying and sharing data for secondary data analysis of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and their determinants across the life course in Europe: general principles and an example from DEDIPAC

Download (614.84 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2017-12-21, 09:35 authored by Jeroen Lakerveld, Anne Loyen, Fiona Chun Man Ling, Marieke De Craemer, Hidde P. van der Ploeg, Donal J. O'Gorman, Angela Carlin, Laura Capranica, Joeri Kalter, Jean-Michel Oppert, Sebastien Chastin, Greet Cardon, Johannes Brug, Ciaran MacDonnchaCiaran MacDonncha
Background The utilisation of available cross-European data for secondary data analyses on physical activity, sedentary behaviours and their underlying determinants may benefit from the wide variation that exists across Europe in terms of these behaviours and their determinants. Such reuse of existing data for further research requires Findable; Accessible; Interoperable; Reusable (FAIR) data management and stewardship. We here describe the inventory and development of a comprehensive European dataset compendium and the process towards cross-European secondary data analyses of pooled data on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and their correlates across the life course. Methods A five-step methodology was followed by the European Determinants of Diet and Physical Activity (DEDIPAC) Knowledge Hub, covering the (1) identification of relevant datasets across Europe, (2) development of a compendium including details on the design, study population, measures and level of accessibility of data from each study, (3) definition of key topics and approaches for secondary analyses, (4) process of gaining access to datasets and (5) pooling and harmonisation of the data and the development of a data harmonisation platform. Results A total of 114 unique datasets were found for inclusion within the DEDIPAC compendium. Of these datasets, 14 were eventually obtained and reused to address 10 exemplar research questions. The DEDIPAC data harmonisation platform proved to be useful for pooling, but in general, harmonisation was often restricted to just a few core (crude) outcome variables and some individual-level sociodemographic correlates of these behaviours. Conclusions Obtaining, pooling and harmonising data for secondary data analyses proved to be difficult and sometimes even impossible. Compliance to FAIR data management and stewardship principles currently appears to be limited for research in the field of physical activity

Funding

Development of a structure identification methodology for nonlinear dynamic systems

National Research Foundation

Find out more...

History

Publication

BMJ Open;7: e017489

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group

Note

peer-reviewed

Other Funding information

Belgium: Research Foundation – Flanders, France: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Germany: Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Italy: Ministry of Education, University and Research, Ministry of Agriculture Food and Forestry Policies; Ireland, HRB, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), UK: The Medical Research Council (MRC)

Language

English

Usage metrics

    University of Limerick

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC