University of Limerick
Browse
- No file added yet -

Impacts of electronic process guides by types of user: an experimental study

Download (38.68 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2017-01-04, 09:57 authored by Manuel Mora, Rory V. O'Connor, Mahesh S. Raisinghani, Ovsei Gelman
The design and utilization of Electronic Process Guides (EPGs) have been studied in the Software Engineering (SwE) since the1990's. However, the empirical findings from surveys, case studies, and experiments on the beneficial effectffigures of their utilization are still lacking. Thus, we suggest that further research on the utilization of EPGs is required. In this study, we are interested in gaining insights on the effects of using EPGs on objective metrics (learning score, time effort) and subjective metrics (perceived usefulness, ease of use, and value), by comparing three EPG designs (a simple PDF-based EPG, a normal HTML-based EPG, and a sophisticated Java-based EPG) with different blocks of experimental subjects (practitioners, academicians, novices, and experts). To this end we have conducted a controlled experiment with a sample of international participants in the domain of IT Service Management. We found that the utilization of EPGs improves the objective metrics while no improvements were perceived on the subjective ones, and that the sophisticated EPG design is more appropriate for the academic and expert types of users than for the practitioner and novice types. Thus, our main recommendation for the design and utilization of EPGs is to consider the type of end user,

History

Publication

International Journal of Information Management;36 (1), pp. 73-88

Publisher

Elsevier

Note

peer-reviewed

Other Funding information

Autonomous University of Aguascaliente

Rights

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in International Journal of Information Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in International Journal of Information Management, 36 (1), pp. 73-88, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.10.001

Language

English

Usage metrics

    University of Limerick

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC