posted on 2017-01-04, 09:57authored byManuel Mora, Rory V. O'Connor, Mahesh S. Raisinghani, Ovsei Gelman
The design and utilization of Electronic Process Guides (EPGs) have been studied in the Software Engineering
(SwE) since the1990's. However, the empirical findings from surveys, case studies, and experiments on the
beneficial effectffigures of their utilization are still lacking. Thus, we suggest that further research on the
utilization of EPGs is required. In this study, we are interested in gaining insights on the effects of using EPGs
on objective metrics (learning score, time effort) and subjective metrics (perceived usefulness, ease of use, and
value), by comparing three EPG designs (a simple PDF-based EPG, a normal HTML-based EPG, and a
sophisticated Java-based EPG) with different blocks of experimental subjects (practitioners, academicians,
novices, and experts). To this end we have conducted a controlled experiment with a sample of international
participants in the domain of IT Service Management. We found that the utilization of EPGs improves the
objective metrics while no improvements were perceived on the subjective ones, and that the sophisticated
EPG design is more appropriate for the academic and expert types of users than for the practitioner and novice
types. Thus, our main recommendation for the design and utilization of EPGs is to consider the type of end user,
History
Publication
International Journal of Information Management;36 (1), pp. 73-88
Publisher
Elsevier
Note
peer-reviewed
Other Funding information
Autonomous University of Aguascaliente
Rights
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in International Journal of Information Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in International Journal of Information Management, 36 (1), pp. 73-88, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.10.001