posted on 2018-03-26, 08:40authored byPatrick Tobin-Schnittger, Jane O'Doherty, Ray O'Connor, Andrew O'ReganAndrew O'Regan
Background: Referral letters sent from primary to secondary or tertiary care are a crucial
element in the continuity of patient information transfer. Internationally, the need for
improvement in this area has been recognised. This aim of this study is to review
the current literature pertaining to interventions that are designed to improve referral
letter quality. Methods: A search strategy designed following a Problem, Intervention,
Comparator,Outcomemodelwas used to explore the PubMed and EMBASE databases for
relevant literature. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established and bibliographies
were screened for relevant resources. Results: A total of 18 publications were included in
this study. Four types of interventions were described: electronic referrals were shown to
have several advantages over paper referrals but were also found to impose new barriers;
peer feedback increases letter quality and can decrease ‘inappropriate referrals’ by up to
50%; templates increase documentation and awareness of risk factors;mixed interventions
combining different intervention types provide tangible improvements in content and
appropriateness. Conclusion: Several methodological considerations were identified in
the studies reviewed but our analysis demonstrates that a combination of interventions,
introduced as part of a joint package and involving peer feedback can improve.
History
Publication
Primary Health Care Research and Development; 19 (3), pp. 211-222
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Note
peer-reviewed
Rights
Material on these pages is copyright Cambridge University Press or reproduced with permission from other copyright owners. It may be downloaded and printed for personal reference, but not otherwise copied, altered in any way or transmitted to others (unless explicitly stated otherwise) without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. Hypertext links to other Web locations are for the convenience of users and do not constitute any endorsement or authorisation by Cambridge University Press.