The anti-listerial effectiveness of thyme essential oil (EO) and EO compounds camphor and verbenone was examined on fresh-cut lettuce, cantaloupe melon and pineapple with modified atmospheres and air in model packages at 4 and 8 degrees C. Listeria monocytogenes was found to be able to survive and grow in all atmospheres on melon and lettuce. However, on pineapple lowest survival was identified, presumably due to product pH. Thyme EO demonstrated the best anti-listerial effect, although direct application of the EO compromised product appearance. While camphor showed no anti-listerial effects, verbenone was found to have anti-listerial properties and maintained high sensory acceptance in fresh-cut fruit. The high growth rates of L. monocytogenes on melon were significantly reduced with the application of verbenone while being completely eliminated on pineapple. The use of thyme EO and verbenone as an antimicrobial dip was successfully applied to reduce growth of Listeria on fresh-cut melon and eliminate growth on pineapple; however growth-reduction was less pronounced in melon when compared to a conventional chlorine dip. Further research will be necessary to optimise conditions in fresh-cut produce treatments with natural products including verbenone and thyme EO to replace current chlorine treatments for improved food safety. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
History
Publication
Postharvest Biology and Technology;120, pp. 61-68
Publisher
Elsevier
Note
peer-reviewed
Figures to accompany this article are on file 2
Other Funding information
Irish Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine
Rights
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Postharvest Biology and Technology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Postharvest Biology and Technology, 120, pp. 61-68, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.05.005