posted on 2020-01-28, 09:45authored byThomas M. Comyns, Eamonn P. Flanagan, Sean Fleming, Evan Fitzgerald, Damian J. Harper
Purpose: This investigation examined the inter-day reliability and usefulness of
reactive strength index (RSI) derived from a maximal 5 rebound jump test (5max RJT)
and a maximal 10 rebound jump test (10/5 RJT). Methods: Twenty male field sport
athletes (24.5±3.0 y; 1.78±0.1 m; 84.9±5.2 kg) performed 2 maximal repetitions of
the 5max RJT and the 10/5 RJT on two testing days following a specific warm up. A
one week period separated each testing day and these sessions were proceeded by a
familiarisation session. RSI was calculated by dividing jump height (m) by contact
time (s). The 5max RJT and the 10/5 RJT trial with the highest RSI on each testing day
was used for reliability and usefulness analysis. Results: Both tests were deemed
reliable for determining RSI for male, female and pooled male and female cohorts as
the ICCs ≥ 0.80 and the CV ≤ 10%. Only the 5max RJT was rated as ‘good’ at
detecting the smallest worthwhile change (SWC) in performance for female athletes
(SWC: 0.10 ˃ TE:0.07). The 5max RJT for males and the 10/5 RJT for males and
females were rated as ‘good’ in detecting a moderate change in performance only.
Conclusions: Both tests are reliable for the determination of RSI but the usefulness of
the tests in detecting the SWC is questionable.
History
Publication
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance;14 (9) pp. 1200-1204