While culture, religion, and economics are frequently used to describe and
theorize nationalisms and national identity, gender and migration are
frequently overlooked (see Smith; Anderson; Gellner). Jill Vickers asserts
that the lack of attention to gender relations in the formation of collective
identity and the development of cultural cohesion has led to large gaps in
the theorization of nationalisms. Nira Yuval-Davis asks why women are
"hidden" in the various theorizations of nationhood, when women play
such a central role in the biological, cultural, and symbolic reproduciton
of nations. Women's guests for national identity and their complicity
with many of the practices that uphold national identities are as yet
unexamined (see Curthoys 173). Women's migration, movement, and
identification with nation or place have, in my view, important contributions
to make to our understanding of how national identity is produced
and how it changes across and within national boundaries.
History
Publication
National Women's Studies Association Journal;8 (1), pp. 85-109