posted on 2018-05-11, 13:32authored byJaime Serra-Olivares, Luis M. García-Lopez, Antonio Calderón
The ecological validity of three representative games of the invasion
games tactical problems (keeping possession, attacking the
goal and scoring) for assessing the game performance of 21 U-10
youth soccer players was analyzed. Data were analyzed according
to the year of competition of the players in U-10 categories (First
or Second) and the level of expertise. Second year players game
performance was significantly higher in decisions for keeping in
the game that represented this tactical problem (U = 33, p = .051,
r = .44), and in passing decisions for keeping in the attacking game
(U = 33, p = .044, r = .42). The level of expertise correlated significantly
with the game performance in getting-free decisions and
executions (rho = .573, p = .007; rho = .620, p = .003) for keeping
in the keeping game, and also in the getting-free executions
for attacking in the scoring game (rho = .480, p = .028). Less
skilled players showed significantly higher values in the “spectator
player” behavior in the scoring game (rho= –.521, p = .015).
The findings are discussed in relation to the ecological validity of
the games for learning and talent assessments.