posted on 2018-11-27, 15:55authored byCamille E. Short, Ann DeSmet, Catherine B. Woods, Susan L. Williams, Carol A. Maher, Anouk Middelweerd, Andre Matthias Müller, Petra A. Wark, Corneel Vandelanotte, Louise Poppe, Melanie D. Hingle, Rik Crutzen
Engagement in electronic health (eHealth) and mobile health (mHealth) behavior change interventions is thought to be important
for intervention effectiveness, though what constitutes engagement and how it enhances efficacy has been somewhat unclear in
the literature. Recently published detailed definitions and conceptual models of engagement have helped to build consensus
around a definition of engagement and improve our understanding of how engagement may influence effectiveness. This work
has helped to establish a clearer research agenda. However, to test the hypotheses generated by the conceptual modules, we need
to know how to measure engagement in a valid and reliable way. The aim of this viewpoint is to provide an overview of engagement
measurement options that can be employed in eHealth and mHealth behavior change intervention evaluations, discuss
methodological considerations, and provide direction for future research. To identify measures, we used snowball sampling,
starting from systematic reviews of engagement research as well as those utilized in studies known to the authors. A wide range
of methods to measure engagement were identified, including qualitative measures, self-report questionnaires, ecological momentary
assessments, system usage data, sensor data, social media data, and psychophysiological measures. Each measurement method
is appraised and examples are provided to illustrate possible use in eHealth and mHealth behavior change research.
Recommendations for future research are provided, based on the limitations of current methods and the heavy reliance on system
usage data as the sole assessment of engagement. The validation and adoption of a wider range of engagement measurements
and their thoughtful application to the study of engagement are encouraged.
History
Publication
journal of Medical Internet Research;20 (11), e292