Musculoskeletal disorder prevalence and psychosocial risk exposures by age and gender in a cohort of office based employees in two academic institutions
This study presents data on self-reported prevalence of Musculo-Skeletal Disorder (MSD) symptoms
and psychosocial risk exposures by age and gender among a group of office based University workers
who use their computers for at least 25% of their workday. Employees in two academic organisations
received an invitation to participate in an on-line questionnaire. A total of n
= 852 office workers
participated in this study; yet respondents who were employed for greater than 12 months were only
included in the study cohort. Furthermore, participants were only considered for further analysis if
they spent 50% or more of their workday in their office, and of this time at least 50% was spent on
computer work (n
= 569). The study indicates that self-reported symptoms of MSDs for these workers
were highest in the neck, shoulder and lower back. Neck, shoulder and back MSDs were higher for
females than males, yet age differences within genders were not evident for these symptoms. For neck
disorders, symptomatic individuals reported significantly higher levels of office work (p < 0.05) and PC
usage (p < 0.005), and significantly lower levels of job content (p < 0.01), job demands (p < 0.05), and
work environment (p < 0.05) compared to asymptomatic participants. For the shoulder, symptomatic
individuals exposure levels were significantly higher for office work (p < 0.05) and PC usage (p < 0.05)
and significantly lower for job content (p < 0.05) compared to asymptomatic individuals. There was
evidence of important differences in the psychosocial exposures between age and genders, but associations
between these differences and MSD symptoms were not present.
Relevance to industry: This study presents prevalence data on age and gender differences in self-reported
symptoms of MSDs and psychosocial risk exposures in a group of sedentary workers.
History
Publication
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics;46, pp. 85-97
Publisher
Elsevier
Note
peer-reviewed
Rights
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2015, 46, pp. 85-97, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2014.12.013