posted on 2013-04-12, 15:34authored byElizabeth Murray, Shaun Treweek, Catherine Pope, Anne E. MacFarlane, Luciana Ballini, Christopher Dowrick, Tracy Finch, Anne Kennedy, Frances Mair, Catherine A. O'Donnell, Bie Nio Ong, Tim Rapley, Anne Rogers, Carl R. May
Background: The past decade has seen considerable interest in the development and evaluation of complex
interventions to improve health. Such interventions can only have a significant impact on health and health care if
they are shown to be effective when tested, are capable of being widely implemented and can be normalised into
routine practice. To date, there is still a problematic gap between research and implementation. The Normalisation
Process Theory (NPT) addresses the factors needed for successful implementation and integration of interventions
into routine work (normalisation).
Discussion: In this paper, we suggest that the NPT can act as a sensitising tool, enabling researchers to think
through issues of implementation while designing a complex intervention and its evaluation. The need to ensure
trial procedures that are feasible and compatible with clinical practice is not limited to trials of complex
interventions, and NPT may improve trial design by highlighting potential problems with recruitment or data
collection, as well as ensuring the intervention has good implementation potential.
Summary: The NPT is a new theory which offers trialists a consistent framework that can be used to describe,
assess and enhance implementation potential. We encourage trialists to consider using it in their next trial.