University of Limerick
Browse
- No file added yet -

Patient influence on general practice service improvement decision making: a participatory research mixed-methods intervention study

Download (108.93 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-08-20, 13:09 authored by Jessica Drinkwater, Anne MacFarlaneAnne MacFarlane, Maureen Twiddy, David Meads, Ruth H Chadwick, Ailsa Donnelly, Phil Gleeson, Nick Hayward, Michael Kelly, Robina Mir, Graham Prestwich, Martin Rathfelder, Robbie Foy

Background Health policy promotes patient participation in decision making about service organisation. In English general practice this happens through contractually required patient participation groups (PPGs). However, there are problems with the enactment of PPGs that have not been systematically addressed.

Aim To observe how a co-designed theory-informed intervention can increase representational legitimacy and facilitate power sharing to support PPGs to influence decision making about general practice service improvement.

Design and setting Participatory action research to implement the intervention in two general practices in the North of England was undertaken. The intervention combined two different participatory practices: partnership working involving externally facilitated meetings with PPG members and staff; and consultation with the wider patient population using a bespoke discrete choice experiment (DCE).

Method To illustrate decision making in PPGs, qualitative data are presented from participant observation notes and photographed visual data generated through participatory methods. The DCE results are summarised to illustrate how wider population priorities contributed to overall decision making. Observational data were thematically analysed using normalisation process theory with support from a multi-stakeholder co-research group.

Results In both general practices, patients influenced decision making during PPG meetings and through the DCE, resulting in bespoke patient-centred action plans for service improvement. Power asymmetries were addressed through participatory methods, clarification of PPG roles in decision making, and addressing representational legitimacy through wider survey consultation.

Conclusion Combining participatory practices and facilitated participatory methods enabled patients to influence decision making about general practice service improvement. The policy of mandatory PPGs needs updating to recognise the need to resource participation in a meaningful way.

History

Publication

British Journal of General Practice 2024, 74 (745), e552-e559

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Other Funding information

Jessica Drinkwater, doctoral research fellow, DRF-2015–08-081, was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) for this research project. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, NHS, or the UK Department of Health and Social Care.

Also affiliated with

  • Health Research Institute (HRI)

Department or School

  • School of Medicine

Usage metrics

    University of Limerick

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC