Physiotherapists report improved understanding of and attitude toward the cognitive, psychological and social dimensions of chronic low back pain after cognitive functional therapy training: a qualitative study
Question: What are physiotherapists’ perspectives on managing the cognitive, psychological and social
dimensions of chronic low back pain after intensive biopsychosocial training? Design: Qualitative study
design using semi-structured interviews to explore physiotherapists’ perceptions of their identification
and treatment of the biopsychosocial dimensions of chronic low back pain after intensive Cognitive
Functional Therapy (CFT) training. Participants: Thirteen qualified physiotherapists from four countries
who had received specific CFT training. The training involved supervised implementation of CFT in
clinical practice with patients. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. An interpretive
descriptive analysis was performed using a qualitative software package. Results: Four main themes
emerged from the data: self-reported changes in understanding and attitudes; self-reported changes in
professional practice; altered scope of practice; and increased confidence and satisfaction. Participants
described increased understanding of the nature of pain, the role of patient beliefs, and a new
appreciation of the therapeutic alliance. Changes in practice included use of new assessments, changes in
communication, and adoption of a functional approach. Since undertaking CFT training, participants
described a greater awareness of their role and scope of practice as clinicians in identifying and
addressing these factors. Conclusion: Physiotherapists expressed confidence in their capacity and skill
set to manage the biopsychosocial dimensions of chronic low back pain after CFT training, and identified a
clear role for including these skills within the physiotherapy profession. Despite this, further clinical trials
are needed to justify the time and cost of training, so that intensive CFT training may be made more
readily accessible to clinicians, which to date has not been the case.
History
Publication
Journal of Physiotherapy;62, pp. 215-221
Publisher
Elsevier
Note
peer-reviewed
Open Access funded by Australian Physiotherapy Association