Discourse and rhetoric of service-user involvement are pervasive in all
mental health services that see themselves as promoting a Recovery ethos. Yet, for the
service-user movement internationally, ‘Recovery’ was articulated as an alternative
discourse of overcoming and resisting an institutionalized and oppressive psychiatric
model of care. Power is all pervasive within mental health services yet often
to expose the unacknowledged structural and power constraints on participants. My
research problematizes practices of user involvement in one mental health service
area in Ireland.
Part I of this article examines the background context of policies and practices
of user-involvement from the service-user perspective and explains developments in
relation to service-user involvement in the case of Ireland. Participants in my study
articulate their motivation for engagement with mental health service reform in terms
of the right to participate in social justice terms, of wanting to improve services and
involvement.
Part II of this article presents an explanatory framework of power, using a model
explanatory potential of this model to highlight how hidden and invisible power
operates in mental health services is illustrated by selected comments from the same
in service-user involvement spaces. Showing how different forms of power operate
in the spaces and levels of mental health involvement can develop service-users’
services.