posted on 2020-04-20, 10:34authored byMohamed E. Elsayed, Adam D. Morris, Xia Li, Leonard D. Browne, Austin G. Stack
Background. Accurate comparisons of haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) survival based on observational studies are difficult due to substantial residual confounding that arises from imbalances between treatments. Propensity score
matching (PSM) comparisons confer additional advantages over conventional methods of adjustment by further reducing selection bias between treatments. We conducted a systematic review of studies that compared mortality between in-centre HD with PD using a PSM-based approach. Methods. A sensitive search strategy identified all citations in the
PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE databases from inception through November 2018. Pooled PD versus HD mortality hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated through random-effects meta-analysis. A subsequent metaregression
explored factors to account for between-study variation