University of Limerick
Browse

Reply: cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer.

Download (69.72 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2016-03-01, 10:06 authored by Linda Sharp, Cathal Dominic Walsh, Sophie Whyte, Lesley Tilson, Alan O'Ceilleachair, Cara Usher, Paul Tappenden, James Chilcott, Anthony Staines, Michael Barry, Harry Comber
In his letter, Dr O’Mahony (2012) makes two main points. The first of these relates to the number of alternatives explored during our assessment of colorectal cancer screening in Ireland (Sharp et al, 2012), and the second relates to the terminology used in the paper. Our paper reports findings from a health technology assessment (HTA) of colorectal cancer screening; the full report has been published (Health Information and Quality Authority, 2009a). The purpose of HTA is to inform decision makers about the relative efficacy and costs of possible health-care interventions in order that coherent policy decisions can be taken. In the case of our work, the question of interest was whether population screening for colorectal cancer in Ireland would be effective and cost effective.

History

Publication

British Journal of Cancer;108, pp. 1211-1212

Publisher

Nature Publishing Group

Note

peer-reviewed

Rights

First published in British Journal of Cancer, 2013, 108, pp. 1211-1212, http://dx.doi.org/doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.491

Language

English

Usage metrics

    University of Limerick

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC