posted on 2020-10-15, 14:23authored byTimothy J. Conroy, Maurice N. Collins, RONAN GRIMESRONAN GRIMES
A variety of tube materials and geometries are considered in an analysis that identifies suitable sodium
receiver designs for integration with next-generation thermodynamic power cycles. Sodium is capable of
delivering outlet temperatures of >750° C , however the net power output diminishes with rising temperatures due to tube material limitations on allowable flux density and increasing heat losses. Small
tube diameters facilitate large thermal efficiencies and heat fluxes for all materials, however a large
pressure drop penalty can somewhat mitigate these advantages. Traditional heat exchanger alloys
perform quite poorly in comparison to Inconel 617 and Haynes 230, with allowable heat flux decreasing
significantly as temperatures are increased beyond 600° C. . Multi-pass concepts offer greater control of
flow-path exposure to the heat flux boundary condition than straightforward single-pass designs. A
triple-panel design with small diameter Inconel 617 tubes balances thermal, hydraulic, and mechanical
performance most effectively across all temperatures. For all candidate materials, sodium can augment
power plant efficiency when integrated with a high temperature cycle (> 600°C) . A combined receiver
and power cycle efficiency percentage point improvement of 1:5% is possible using Ni-based superalloys
at ∼650−700°◦C compared to a baseline outlet temperature of 550°C, resulting in a solar-to-electric
power output increase of over 4%.
History
Publication
Energy;187, 115994
Publisher
Elsevier
Note
peer-reviewed
Rights
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Energy Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Energy, 187, 115994,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.115994