posted on 2017-04-27, 15:25authored byAlice B. Nongonierma, Richard J. Fitzgerald
Background: The
widespread application of protein-derived bioactive peptides (BAPs) with health
promoting properties in human nutrition is currently limited. This may be due
to the fact that several challenges exist in the discovery and identification
of BAPs both in vitro and in vivo.
Scope and
approach: To date, most BAP studies have been conducted
following a so-called conventional approach. This is based on the non-targeted
release of BAPs in vitro, followed,
in certain instances, with their subsequent evaluation in vivo. However, more targeted approaches have recently been
described for the release of specific BAPs in a more predictable and efficient
manner. These targeted approaches are mostly based on in silico protocols (e.g., peptide cutters, molecular docking,
quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) models) aimed at predicting
the release and/or the bioactivity of specific peptides.
Key findings: Targeted
approaches have, in certain instances, resulted in the development of
particularly potent BAPs/hydrolysates and the discovery of novel BAP sequences.
In addition, significant progress has been made in the identification of short
peptides, involving the utilisation of multi-stage processes combining various
physicochemical, analytical and in silico
tools. This has allowed identification of novel sequences which are more relevant
to human health from a bioavailability and stability perspective. BAPs have
successfully been detected and quantified in human samples (e.g., serum,
intestinal contents and urine) using different liquid chromatography-mass
spectrometric (LC-MS) methodologies. In addition, human dose-response studies
have allowed determination of their in
vivo potency and efficacy, which in turn contributes to the development of scientific
dossiers for regulatory approval.
History
Publication
Trends in Food Science and Technology; 69, Part B, pp. 289-305
Publisher
Elsevier
Note
peer-reviewed
Other Funding information
EI
Rights
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Trends in Food Science and Technolgy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Trends in Food Science and Technology, 2017 69, Part B, pp. 289-305http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.03.003