Supporting the use of theory in crosscountry health services research: a participatory qualitative approach using normalisation process theory as an example
posted on 2017-11-16, 11:59authored byCatherine A. O'Donnell, Frances Mair, Christopher Dowrick, Mary O'Reilly-de Brún, Tomas de Brún, Nicola Burns, Christos Lionis, Aristoula Saridaki, Maria Papadakaki, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Evelyn van Weel-Baumgarten, Katja Gravenhorst, Lucy Cooper, Christine Princz, Erik Teunissen, Francine van den Driessen Mareeuw, Maria Vlahadi, Wolfgang Spiegel, Anne E. MacFarlane
Objectives To describe and reflect on the process of
designing and delivering a training programme supporting
the use of theory, in this case Normalisation Process
Theory (NPT), in a multisite cross-country health services
research study.
Design Participatory research approach using qualitative
methods.
Setting Six European primary care settings involving
research teams from Austria, England, Greece, Ireland, The
Netherlands and Scotland.
Participants RESTORE research team consisting of 8
project applicants, all senior primary care academics,
and 10 researchers. Professional backgrounds included
general practitioners/family doctors, social/cultural
anthropologists, sociologists and health services/primary
care researchers.
Primary outcome measures Views of all research
team members (n=18) were assessed using qualitative
evaluation methods, analysed qualitatively by the trainers
after each session.
Results Most of the team had no experience of using
NPT and many had not applied theory to prospective,
qualitative research projects. Early training proved
didactic and overloaded participants with information.
Drawing on RESTORE’s methodological approach of
Participatory Learning and Action, workshops using role
play, experiential interactive exercises and light-hearted
examples not directly related to the study subject matter
were developed. Evaluation showed the study team
quickly grew in knowledge and confidence in applying
theory to fieldwork. Recommendations applicable to other
studies include: accepting that theory application is not a
linear process, that time is needed to address researcher
concerns with the process, and that experiential,
interactive learning is a key device in building conceptual
and practical knowledge. An unanticipated benefit was the
smooth transition to cross-country qualitative coding of
study data.
Conclusion A structured programme of training enhanced
and supported the prospective application of a theory,
NPT, to our work but raised challenges. These were not
unique to NPT but could arise with the application of any
theory, especially in large multisite, international projects.
The lessons learnt are applicable to other theoretically
informed studies.