Background Rugby union is a physically demanding, fullcontact team sport that has gained worldwide popularity. The incidence of injury in rugby union has been widely
reported in the literature. While comprehensive injury surveillance and prevention programmes have been implemented within the professional game, there is a need
for similar strategies in the amateur game. Despite recent increases in the volume of research in rugby, there is little consensus regarding the true incidence rate of match and
training injuries in senior amateur male rugby union players.
Objective The aim of the current review was to systematically review the available evidence on the epidemiology of time-loss injuries in senior amateur male rugby union
players and to subsequently conduct a meta-analysis of the findings.
Methods A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Scopus, SportDiscus and Google Scholar electronic databases was performed using the following keywords; (‘rugby’ OR
‘rugby union’) AND (‘amateur’ OR ‘community’) AND(‘injur*’ OR ‘pain*’). Six articles regarding the incidence of injury in senior amateur male rugby union players, in
both matches and training, were retrieved and included in the meta-analysis to determine the overall incidence rate of match injury, with descriptive analyses also provided for
other reported variables.
Results The overall incidence rate of match injuries within senior amateur rugby union players was 46.8/1000 player hours [95% confidence interval (CI) 34.4–59.2]. Contact
events accounted for the majority of injuries, with the tackler more at risk than the player being tackled, and with respective incidence rates of 15.9/1000 player hours (95%
CI 12.4–19.5) and 12.2/1000 player hours (95% CI 9.3–15.1).
Conclusion This meta-analysis found that the incidence rate of injury in amateur rugby union players was lower than that in professional players, but higher than the incidences
reported in adolescent and youth rugby players. By understanding the true incidence and nature of injuries in rugby, injury prevention strategies can best be implemented.
Future prevention strategies may best be aimed towards the tackle area, specifically to the tackler, in order to minimize injury risk.
History
Publication
Sports Medicine; 48, pp. 837-848
Publisher
Springer
Note
peer-reviewed
Other Funding information
Irish Rugby Football Union, University of Limerick