posted on 2022-02-09, 11:47authored byThomas N. Garavan, Alma McCarthy, Yanqing Lai, Kevin R. Murphy, Maura Sheehan, Ronan Carbery
Drawing on systems theory, we conducted a moderated meta-analysis of the training and
organizational performance relationship using 119 primary studies. We examined the
moderating effects of quality versus quantity of training, time, institutional, and
organizational context factors in the relationship between training and organizational
performance. Our findings reveal that training is positively and directly related to
organizational performance with no statistically significant difference between measures of
training quality and quantity. We found that the relationship was stronger over time and that
country performance orientation and country labor cost moderate the training and
organizational performance relationship. We found no evidence for the moderating effects of
the three organizational context moderators we examined (i.e., industry sector, organizational
size and technology intensity). Finally, our results reveal that training type (i.e., general or
firm-specific) does not moderate the training and organizational performance relationship.
History
Publication
Human Resource Management Journal;31, pp.93-119
Publisher
Wiley and Sons Ltd
Note
peer-reviewed
Rights
This is the peer reviewed author version of the following article: Training and organisational performance: A meta-analysis of temporal, institutional and organisational context moderators , which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12284 . This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-828039.html#terms