posted on 2019-02-25, 12:04authored byMelissa M. Park, Hiba Zafran, Janet Stewart, Jon Salsberg, Carolyn Ells, Suzanne Rouleau, Orly Estein, Thomas W. Valente
Background: Since 2007, the Mental Health Commission of Canada has worked collaboratively across all provinces
to publish a framework and strategy for recovery and well-being. This federal document is now mandated as
policy for implementation between 2012 and 2017. The proposed strategies have been written into provincial
health plans, hospital accreditation standards, and annual objectives of psychiatric departments and community
organizations. The core premise is: to empower persons with mental illness and their families to become
participants in designing their own care, while meeting the needs of a diverse Canadian population. However,
recovery principles do not come with an implementation guide to fit the variability of different local contexts. How
can policy recommendations and accreditation standards be effectively tailored to support a diversity of stakeholder
values? To our knowledge, there is little evidence indicating the most effective manner to accelerate the uptake of
recovery-oriented services among providers in a given/particular mental health treatment setting.
Methods/Design: This three-year Canadian Institute of Health Research Partnership in Health System Improvement
and The Rx&D Health Research Foundation (HRF) Fostering Canadian Innovation in Research study (2013 to 2017)
proposed participatory approaches to implementing recovery principles in a Department of Psychiatry serving a
highly diverse Canadian and immigrant population. This project will be conducted in overlapping and recursive
phases: I) Conduct formative research to (a) measure the current knowledge and attitudes toward recovery and
recovery-oriented practices among service providers, while concurrently (b) exploring the experiential knowledge of
recovery service-users and family members; II) Collaborate with service-users and the network-identified opinion
leaders among providers to tailor Recovery-in-Action Initiatives to fit the needs and resources of a Department of
Psychiatry; and III) Conduct a systematic theory-based evaluation of changes in attitudes and practices within the
service-user/service-provider partnership group relative to the overall provider network of the department and
identify the barriers and supports within the local context.
Discussion: Our anticipated outcome is a participatory toolkit to tailor recovery-oriented services, which will be
disseminated to the Mental Health Commission of Canada and Accreditation Canada at the federal level, agencies
at the provincial levels, and local knowledge end-users.