University of Limerick
Browse
DOCUMENT
Fig1.pdf (57.74 kB)
DOCUMENT
Schmalenberger_EurJSoilBiol2008.pdf (338.89 kB)
DOCUMENT
Fig3.pdf (1.13 MB)
DOCUMENT
Fig2.pdf (14.66 kB)
1/0
4 files

Two-dimensional single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) of 16S rRNA gene fragments reveals highly dissimilar bacterial communities in an acidic fen

journal contribution
posted on 2014-03-03, 14:25 authored by Achim SchmalenbergerAchim Schmalenberger, Christoph C. Tebbe, Michael A. Kertesz, Harold L. Drake, Kristen Küsel
Genetic fingerprinting methods such as denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) are only able to separate about 20–40 well-distinguishable bands (signals) within each sample. As a result, the diversity of 16S rRNA genes within biological samples may be underestimated, because multiple sequences can migrate at the same rate to form a single band. This study reports a two-dimensional SSCP fingerprinting method that has the capability to resolve hundreds of signals in a single fingerprint by using different gel temperatures in the two dimensions of the separation (20 °C and 30 °C, respectively). Unlike previous two-dimensional approaches, the method presented in this study does not rely on DNA products of variable lengths but is able to separate 16S rRNA gene fragments of the same length. To demonstrate the effectiveness of this new method, DNA samples from oxic and anoxic zones of an acidic fen were examined. Whereas one-dimensional SSCP fingerprints indicated high similarity (>93%) between 16S rRNA gene fragments from oxic and anoxic zones of the fen, the two-dimensional SSCP approach virtually found no similarities.

History

Publication

European Journal of Soil Biology;44, (5-6), pp. 495-500

Publisher

Elsevier

Note

peer-reviewed

Rights

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in European Journal of Soil Biology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in European Journal of Soil Biology, 44, (5-6), pp. 495-500, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.07.002

Language

English

Usage metrics

    University of Limerick

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC