Update to the focus, affinity and effects trials studying the effect(s) of fluoxetine in patients with a recent stroke: statistical analysis plan for the trials and for the individual patient data meta-analysis
posted on 2020-11-30, 11:45authored byGillian Elizabeth Mead, Catriona Graham, Laurent Billot, Per Näsman, Erik Lundström, Steff Lewis, Graeme J. Hankey, Maree L. Hackett, John F. Forbes, Martin Dennis, affinity and effects trialists On behalf of the focus
Background: Three large trials of fluoxetine for stroke recovery (FOCUS (fluoxetine or
control under supervision), AFFINITY (the Assessment oF FluoxetINe In sTroke recovery) and EFFECTS (Efficacy oF Fluoxetine—a randomisEd Controlled Trial in Stroke)) have been collaboratively designed with the same basic protocol to facilitate an individual patient data analysis (IPDM). The statistical analysis plan for the three individual trials has already been reported in Trials, including a brief description of the IPDM. In this
protocol, we describe in detail how we will perform the IPDM. Methods/design: Data from
EFFECTS and AFFINITY will be transferred securely to the FOCUS statistician, who will
perform a one-stage IPDM and a two-stage IPDM. For the one-stage IPDM, data will be
combined into a single data set and the same analyses performed as described for the
individual trials. For the two-stage IPDM, the results for the three individual trials will be combined using fixed effects meta-analyses. The primary and secondary outcome
domains for the IPDM are the same as for individual trials. We will also perform analyses
according to several subgroups including country of recruitment, ethnicity and trial. We
will also explore the effects of fluoxetine on our primary and secondary outcomes in
subgroups defined by combinations of characteristics. We also describe additional research questions that will be addressed using the combined data set, and published subsequently, including predictors of important post-stroke problems such as seizures, low mood and bone fractures. Discussion: An IPDM of our three large trials of fluoxetine for stroke recovery will allow us to provide the most precise estimates of any risks and benefits of fluoxetine vs placebo, to detect reliably a smaller overall effect size than those detectable by the individual trials, to better determine the effects of fluoxetine vs placebo in subgroups of patients and outcomes and to broaden the generalisability of the results. Also, we may identify differences in treatment effects between studies.