Objectives: With prevention and treatment of mental disorders a challenge for primary care and
increasing capability of electronic medical records (EMRs) to facilitate research in practice, we aim
to determine the prevalence and treatment of mental disorders by using routinely collected clinical
data contained in EMRs.
Methods: We reviewed EMRs of patients randomly sampled from seven general practices, by
piloting a study instrument and extracting data on mental disorders and their treatment.
Reslllts: Data were collected on 690 patients (age range 18-95, 52% male, 52% GMS-eligible). A
mental disorder (most commonly anxiety I stress, depression and problem alcohol use) was recorded
in the clinical records of 139 (20%) during the two year study period. While most patients with the
common disorders had been prescribed medication (I.e. antidepressants or benzodiazepines), a
minority had been referred to other agencies or received psychological interventions. 'Free text'
consultation notes and 'prescriptions' were how most patients with disorders were identified.
Diagnostic coding alone would have failed to identify 92% of patients with a disorder.
Conclllsions: Although mental disorders are common in general practice, this study suggests their
formal diagnosis, disease coding and access to psychological treatments are priorities for future
research efforts.
History
Publication
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine;33 (1), pp. 3-12
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Note
peer-reviewed
Other Funding information
University of Limerick Research Incentives Programme, University of Limerick Graduate Entry Medical School
Rights
Material on these pages is copyright Cambridge University Press or reproduced with permission from other copyright owners. It may be downloaded and printed for personal reference, but not otherwise copied, altered in any way or transmitted to others (unless explicitly stated otherwise) without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. Hypertext links to other Web locations are for the convenience of users and do not constitute any endorsement or authorisation by Cambridge University Press.