posted on 2016-09-01, 15:07authored byAnne Loyen, Maïté Verloigne, Linde Van Hecke, Ingrid J.M. Hendriksen, Jeroen Lakerveld, Jostein Steene-Johannessen, Annemarie Koster, Alan Edward Donnelly, Ulf Ekelund, Benedicte Deforche, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Johannes Brug, Hidde P. van der Ploeg
Background: Sedentary behaviour is increasingly recognized as a public health risk that needs to be monitored at
the population level. Across Europe, there is increasing interest in assessing population levels of sedentary time. This
systematic literature review aims to provide an overview of all existing cross-European studies that measure
sedentary time in adults, to describe the variation in population levels across these studies and to discuss the
impact of assessment methods.
Methods: Six literature databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SportDiscus and OpenGrey) were searched,
supplemented with backward- and forward tracking and searching authors’ and experts’ literature databases.
Articles were included if they reported on observational studies measuring any form of sedentary time in the
general population in two or more European countries. Each record was reviewed, extracted and assessed by two
independent researchers, and disagreements were resolved by a third researcher. The review protocol of this review
is registered in the PROSPERO database under registration number CRD42014010335.
Results: Of the 9,756 unique articles that were identified in the search, twelve articles were eligible for inclusion in
this review, reporting on six individual studies and three Eurobarometer surveys. These studies represented 2 to 29
countries, and 321 to 65,790 participants. Eleven studies focused on total sedentary time, while one studied screen
time. The majority of studies used questionnaires to assess sedentary time, while two studies used accelerometers.
Total sedentary time was reported most frequently and varied from 150 (median) to 620 (mean) minutes per day
aConclusions: One third of European countries were not included in any of the studies. Objective measures of
European adults are currently limited, and most studies used single-item self-reported questions without assessing
sedentary behaviour types or domains. Findings varied substantially between studies, meaning that population
levels of sedentary time in European adults are currently unknown. In general, people living in northern Europe
countries appear to report more sedentary time than southern Europeans. The findings of this review highlight the
need for standardisation of the measurement methods and the added value of cross-European surveillance of
sedentary behaviour.cross studies and countries.
Funding
Development of a structure identification methodology for nonlinear dynamic systems