Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European children and adolescents according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC
posted on 2016-09-01, 10:54authored byMaïté Verloigne, Anne Loyen, Linde Van Hecke, Jeroen Lakerveld, Ingrid J.M. Hendriksen, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Benedicte Deforche, Alan Edward Donnelly, Ulf Ekelund, Johannes Brug, Hidde P. van der Ploeg
Background: A high amount of sedentary time has been proposed as a risk factor for various health outcomes in
adults. While the evidence is less clear in children and adolescents, monitoring sedentary time is important to
understand the prevalence rates and how this behaviour varies over time and by place. This systematic literature
review aims to provide an overview of existing cross-European studies on sedentary time in children (0-12y) and
adolescents (13-18y), to describe the variation in population levels of sedentary time, and to discuss the impact of
assessment methods.
Methods: Six literature databases were searched (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SportDiscus and OpenGrey),
followed by backward- and forward tracking and searching authors’ and experts’ literature databases. Included
articles were observational studies reporting on levels of sedentary time in the general population of children
and/or adolescents in at least two European countries. Population levels were reported separately for children
and adolescents. Data were reviewed, extracted and assessed by two researchers, with disagreements being
resolved by a third researcher. The review protocol is published under registration number CRD42014013379
in the PROSPERO database.
Forty-two eligible articles were identified, most were cross-sectional (n = 38). The number of included
European countries per article ranged from 2 to 36. Levels of sedentary time were observed to be higher in
East-European countries compared to the rest of Europe. There was a large variation in assessment methods
and reported outcome variables. The majority of articles used a child-specific questionnaire (60 %). Other
methods included accelerometers, parental questionnaires or interviews and ecological momentary assessment
tools. Television time was reported as outcome variable in 57 % of included articles (ranging from a mean
value of 1 h to 2.7 h in children and 1.3 h to 4.4 h in adolescents), total sedentary time in 24 % (ranging
from a mean value of 192 min to 552 min in children and from 268 min to 506 min in adolescents).
A substantial number of published studies report on levels of sedentary time in children and
adolescents across European countries, but there was a large variation in assessment methods. Questionnaires
(child specific) were used most often, but they mostly measured specific screen-based activities and did not
assess total sedentary time. There is a need for harmonisation and standardisation of objective and subjective
methods to assess sedentary time in children and adolescents to enable comparison across countries.
Funding
Development of a structure identification methodology for nonlinear dynamic systems
Interntional Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity;13:69
Publisher
BioMed Central
Note
peer-reviewed
Other Funding information
Belgium: Research Foundation – Flanders, HRB, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), The Research Council of Norway, Division for Society and Health