posted on 2017-12-14, 12:49authored byDavid Nolan, Kieran O'SullivanKieran O'Sullivan, John Stephenson, Peter B. O'Sullivan, Michael Lucock
Background: It is commonly believed lifting is dangerous and the back should be straight during lifting. These
beliefs may arise from healthcare professionals, yet no study has evaluated the lifting and back beliefs of manual
handling advisors (MHAs) and physiotherapists (PTs).
Objectives: To evaluate (i) what lifting technique MHAs and PTs perceive as safest, and why, and (ii) the back
pain beliefs of MHAs and PTs.
Design: Data was collected via an electronic survey.
Method: Participants selected the safest lifting posture from four options: two with a straight back and two with
a more rounded back, with justification. Back beliefs were collected via the Back-Pain Attitudes Questionnaire
(Back-PAQ). Relationships were investigated using multiple linear and logistic regression models.
Results: 400 PTs and MHAs completed the survey. 75% of PTs and 91% of MHAs chose a straight lifting posture
as safest, mostly on the basis that it avoided rounding of the back. MHAs scored significantly higher than PTs on
the Back-PAQ instrument (mean difference = 33.9), indicating more negative back beliefs. Those who chose the
straight back position had significantly more negative back beliefs (mean 81.9, SD 22.7) than those who chose a
round back lift (mean 61.7, SD 21.1).
Conclusion: Avoiding rounding the back while lifting is a common belief in PTs and MHAs, despite the lack of
evidence that any specific spinal posture is a risk factor for low back pain. MHAs, and those who perceived a
straight back position as safest, had significantly more negative back beliefs.
History
Publication
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice;33, pp. 35-40
Publisher
Elsevier
Note
peer-reviewed
Rights
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, 2018, 33, pp. 35-40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2017.10.010