Throughout much of the literature on plagiarism in higher education, there is an
implicit assumption that students who understand plagiarism, who have high
ethical views and declare not to engage in plagiaristic behaviour are able to recognise
it and avoid it in practice. Challenging this supposition, this paper contrasts
students’ self-reported data with their ability to recognise and avoid 10
plagiarism in a proposed case scenario. A questionnaire was adapted from previous
literature and administered to a sample of undergraduate first- and secondyear
university students in an Irish university. Results show that self-reported
measures are not a powerful predictor of the students’ ability to recognise the
practical case as an academic breach, nor to avoid the breach through referenc- 15
ing. This suggests that students’ understanding and awareness of academic
breaches would benefit from experiential learning and that higher education
institutions should not merely rely on providing statements and definitions of
academic misconduct. Also, the results highlight the potential unsuitability of
using self-reported measures to study plagiarism, despite their widespread use.
History
Publication
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education;38 (1), pp. 34-43