posted on 2014-01-27, 09:45authored byBrendan Halpin
In the social and economic sciences it appears that there was a pioneering
enthusiasm for longitudinal data in the late 1960s and early 1970s, resulting
inter alia in the US Panel Study on Income Dynamics (1968) and lifehistory
studies such as Natalie Rogoff Ramsøy’s Norwegian Life History
Study (Rogoff Ramsøy, 1975). While the continuity of the PSID helped a
lot in the development of techniques for the use of individually longitudinal
data, it has been a slow development, but has been nonetheless relentless
and cumulative. By now we have a very substantial array of panel and
life-history studies, longitudinal elements incorporated in exercises such
as the Labour Force Survey, and a growing battery of longitudinal data
sets based on official data collection. Commensurate with the rich data is
a growing body of high-quality research that takes full advantage of its
longitudinality. The argument no longer needs to be made for the greater
richness, power and sheer interest of longitudinal data.
History
Publication
University of Limerick Department of Sociology Working Paper Series;WP2003-01