posted on 2021-11-01, 14:35authored byMartin Joseph Laheen
This thesis explores how tax experts value different facets of expertise in their daily work,
and how the manner and degree to which expertise is valued and experienced varies across
the field. Over the past decade, a series of high profile multinational tax avoidance scandals
has put the work of tax expert domains firmly within the public and political imagination.
The catalyst for this study comes against a backdrop of societal and political scrutiny of the
work of tax experts both in corporate settings, and acting as advisers. As tax experts are the
mediators of tax practice, the way in which they value and deploy their expertise influences
compliance and the implementation of policy. Using a Bourdieusian lens, their expertise
functions as a form of capital that gives them power in the field. Expertise has many facets,
including innovation, knowledge and technical competence. This thesis explores the factors
and circumstances that influence a tax expert’s self-perceptions of the relative value of these
facets of expertise within an overall portfolio of expert capitals. Data for this research came
in two phases. First, from a large survey questionnaire directed at tax experts (N=1061)
working across fifty-nine countries. Second, from sixty-eight semi-structured interviews
conducted with practicing tax experts working across eleven countries. All of our respondents
worked in tax, were at various career stages, and held appointments across all levels of
management. They worked across a broader that usual range of tax expert domains. This
dataset facilitates an exploration of how tax experts’ experiences of these facets vary by
regulatory context, experience, gender, and sector. Bourdieusian theoretical framing is used
to theorise the factors that influence tax experts’ self-perceptions of the value of the facets of
expertise in their daily tax work. While experience (age and career stage) gender, and sector
were factors influencing tax experts’ perceptions of the value of the facets of expertise in
their daily tax work, findings also suggest that levels of regulatory oversight and jurisdiction
are influential in shaping tax experts’ perceptions of the value of the facets of expertise in
daily tax work.