This study contributes to the existing literature on nancial development, crises,
and recovery in small open economies. In this dissertation, we use Iceland as an
example of a small open economy with a sovereign currency and compare it with
Ireland and other periphery countries from the EMU. We critically examine the
developments that preceded the crises in Iceland and Ireland with an emphasis on
the role of capital in
ows. We then empirically investigate the recovery pattern
in Iceland and other peripheral countries. Our ndings can be summarised as follows.
The process of nancial development and its interaction with the real sector
in Iceland and Ireland greatly di er primarily due to their exchange rate regimes
amongst other things. Comparing the two countries, we nd that the adjustment
following a sudden stop to a capital in
ow was faster in Iceland but the collapse
more serious. In particular, the current account adjustment was the result of real
exchange rate depreciations and domestic demand compression. For Ireland and
other members of the euro zone, the adjustment process is much slower. The
adjustment in the current account has been the result of domestic demand compression
in these countries, which have resulted in long-lasting recessions, de
ation
and high unemployment in Ireland, as well as in Italy, Portugal and Spain. Moreover,
our ndings suggest that the role of capital controls combined with nancial
restructuring was crucial in the post{crisis period in Iceland. Finally, we present
a macroeconomic framework in order to understand the process of crisis and recovery
in small open economies. We demonstrate the generation of nancial crisis
and the subsequent adjustment process in a sovereign currency regime through
the use of simulations.