posted on 2022-10-05, 10:33authored byJennifer Donlan
National policy has aimed at making development more sustainable. However,
successful movement towards this goal is not well documented. Some shortcomings in the move towards more sustainable development are the result of unexpected outcomes with regard to policy goals and behaviour. Some previously accepted relationships between indicators are now coming into question. A better understanding of the relationships between infrastructure, behaviour, environment and attitudes is needed to improve the ability of policies to increase the sustainability of settlements.
The EPA-Funded project Sustainability and Future Settlement Patterns in Ireland
(SFSPI) conducted at the University of Limerick’s Centre for Environmental
Research (CER) examined the relative sustainability of 79 Irish settlements (cities, towns, and villages) across three regions of Ireland (Sligo, Midlands, and Limerick).
The resulting database contains 43 sustainable development indicators and indices for environmental, socio-economic, quality of life, and transport domains. The SFSPI database also produced Ecological Footprints (EF), and component footprints for
energy, waste, water, food, and transport for each study settlement.
This research, designed to complement the SFSPI project, used the SFSPI database to
explore spatial relationships between settlements and sustainable development
indicators. The focus of this research was local and regional effects on the
sustainability of the study settlements and spatial variations in the relationships
between indicators.
A Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) technique was used to explore spatial
variations in the relationships between sustainable development indicators. Many
relationships between sustainable development indicators were found to vary in nature or magnitude across regions. Spatial variation was present in nine of the 37 GWR
models analyzing the combined affects of population change, distance to gateway
and services index on the sustainable development indicators. Statistically significant spatial variation in individual parameter estimates between two variables (one of the independent variables and the dependant variable) was found in five of the 37 GWR models tested. Using GWR results in comparison to results from the previous SFSPI
results showed very important differences. Within SFSPI the relationships between
variables were analysed by traditional linear regression techniques, using data on all 79 settlements without regard to their location, seeking average relationships for all settlements. However, in this study, including location in the analysis resulted in findings which showed up significant variation in both the magnitude, and in some
cases the sign (positive or negative) of the relationships. Such patterns have not been
reported previously in the literature.
A Geographic Information System (GIS) and a custom built scenario tool were used
to model and visualize policy scenarios. A scenario tool within the GIS was developed to simulate the relative effects of policies on the EFs of a settlement, group of settlements, or region. This research developed a tool to test various policies and
policy mixes on a settlement or region in the study area, and automatically visualize
scenario results in map format, illustrating how spatially explicit scenarios can be
used to help develop strategies for meeting sustainable development targets.