Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Publication

Finger pulse monitoring is a reliable and valid tool for measuring heart rate during exercise among adolescents in lab and school settings

Date
2026-01-29
Abstract
Background A finger pulse monitor (FPM) offers multiple advantages for monitoring heart rate during exercise in comparison to chest worn monitors, including: enhanced testing efficiency; less invasive, particularly for vulnerable populations (e.g. children); and, reduced cost. The purpose of this study was to establish the test-retest reliability of an FPM device for monitoring heart rate during a 3-minute step test (3MST30) to estimate cardiorespiratory fitness in a lab and school setting, and to compare indices of reliability with a chest worn heart rate monitor. Methods Participants (N = 29; male = 16, female = 13; age: 15.8 ± 0.7) completed the 3MST30 on two occasions, in a lab setting (T1) and in a school setting (T2), one week apart. Participants wore a Braun® FPM and a Polar® H7 chest strap heart rate monitor. Heart rate in beats per minute (bpm) was recorded on both devices at 1-minute, 2-minutes, 3-minutes, and one minute following test completion. Equivalence testing was used to analyse the data for differences between the two devices by using the TOSTER R package. Results Absolute mean differences between devices and settings were clinically insignificant, with the smallest variance at the 1-minute post recording (FPM p = .012; chest strap = 0.041). There were no statistically significant differences in heart rate measurement between settings. Conclusions This study demonstrates that finger pulse monitoring is a reliable and valid tool for measuring heart rate during sub-maximal exercise in lab and school settings.
Supervisor
Description
Publisher
Springer Nature
Citation
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation 18(42)
Funding code
Funding Information
Sustainable Development Goals
External Link
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Embedded videos