University of Limerick Research Repository

Recent Submissions

  • PublicationOpen Access
    Coping with emotionally challenging research: developing a strategic approach to researcher wellbeing
    (Springer, 2025) Skinner, Tina; Brance, Kristine; Halligan, Sarah; Tsang, Emily; Girling, Heather
    While previous work has highlighted the possible impacts of undertaking emotionally challenging research, it is only recently, particularly within the UK with the 2028 Research Excellence Framework focus on research culture, that this subject is starting to gain senior leadership attention. Funded by the UK Research and Innovation, Researcher England, Enhancing Research Culture fund. We undertook an in-depth study involving researchers across topics and disciplines in the humanities and social science, with the objectives of establishing: the impacts of studying emotionally challenging topics on researchers, what they currently found helpful in preventing and/or coping with these impacts, and what additional support they wanted. In this paper we report on findings related to the latter two objectives to provide insight into how future research projects could be ethically designed to minimize distress, secondary and vicarious trauma in researchers. We then use these findings to formulate an innovative strategic institutional response to researcher wellbeing and emotionally challenging studies that can be implemented in three stages: Bronze, which is focused on awareness raising and the development of policies and guidance that are built into ethical procedures; Silver, involving the establishment of training, clear referral pathways, and (funded) Researcher Wellbeing Plans - including regular academic supervision, team working, and extra time in workloads to undertake wellbeing interventions - built into the design of projects; and Gold, a wholistic institutional response where, in addition to the above, policies, processes, practices and culture are proactively attentive to the prevention of and provision for distress relating to emotionally challenging research.
  • PublicationOpen Access
    Why some inequalities mobilize and others do not
    (Routledge Taylor and Francis, 2025) Foran, Aoife Marie; Jetten, Jolanda; Kirkland, Kelly; Klebl, Christoph; Peters, Kim
    no abstract available
  • PublicationOpen Access
    Facilitators and barriers to engaging in expressive writing among health and social care professionals
    (Public Library of Science, 2025) Smith, Michael A.; Hoult, Lauren M.; Rippon, Daniel; O’Brien, Nicola; Branley-Bell, Dawn; Byrne-Davis, Lucie; Collins, Caitriona; Gallagher, Stephen; Kinman, Gail; Mark, Arron; O’Connor, Daryl B.; Vedhara, Kavita; Williams, Glenn P.; Wetherell, Mark A.
    Healthcare workers in the UK report high levels of burnout and poor wellbeing, and interventions are urgently needed to address this issue. Expressive writing, whereby individuals write about emotionally laden thoughts or experiences, is an effective intervention for reducing stress and enhancing wellbeing, and is a potential candidate for use with healthcare workers. However, it is crucial that the preferences of healthcare workers are taken into account in the design of future trials in this area, and that perceived barriers and facilitators to engaging with expressive writing activities are considered. Therefore, the present study aimed to seek healthcare workers’ views on expressive writing activities for enhancing wellbeing. We informed 11 UK-based health and social care professionals about current research into the potential wellbeing benefits of expressive writing activities and conducted 1:1 semi-structured interviews to determine their preferences, perceived facilitators and barriers to engaging routinely with expressive writing. Data were analysed using deductive, reflective thematic analysis, with the coding framework informed by the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) Model. Key findings, from the perspective of future trial design, were that participants preferred the three good things (writing down three good things that have happened during the day), written benefit finding (writing about positive emotions, thoughts, feelings and life changes in relation to an unfavourable experience) and gratitude letter (writing a letter of appreciation to someone who has never been properly thanked) activities. Participants expressed preferences for simple, brief activities that could be easily embedded into a daily routine. However, it was clear that support from managers, researchers or friends and family would be needed to promote engagement with the activities. Most notably, participants expressed a preference for flexibility in terms of how, when and where they write.
  • PublicationOpen Access
    Indicators for intellectual disability where no formal diagnosis exists but nursing knowledge demonstrates grounds for a formal assessment: a scoping review
    (MDPI, 2025) Doody, Owen; Cithambaram, Kumaresan; Ryan, Judy; Ryan, Ruth; Conway, Martina; Corby, Deirdre
    Globally, 1–3% of the population has an intellectual disability, but some remain undiag-nosed, resulting in limited access to essential health and social care services, poor health outcomes, and higher risks of homelessness, substance abuse, and imprisonment. A formal diagnosis enables early intervention and support. A scoping review was conducted to explore research on undiagnosed intellectual disability, screening processes, and identifying indicators. Method: The scoping review search was conducted using academic databases such as CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and PubMed, along with eight grey literature sources. In addition, the reference lists of the included studies were explored. Information specialists supported and guided the search process. The search included qualitative, quantitative, review, and mixed-method research studies published in English between 2000 and 2024. Two reviewers screened papers for eligibility by title, abstract, and full text. Result: A total of 11,475 papers were screened, with 57 papers from various countries included in the review. Indicators of intellectual disability were identified in three settings: (1) educational settings (preschool, primary, and secondary schools); (2) social care services, including homeless and community services; and (3) criminal services, such as courts, probation, and prisons, highlighting the wide applicability of findings. These indicators were linked to “experiences”, “behaviours”, “challenges”, and “observations”. Conclusion: This review emphasised the importance of early diagnosis by adopting appropriate assessment tools, which require national screening policies. It also highlighted the essential role of professionals working in intellectual disability services in identifying and supporting undiagnosed individuals, particularly within high-risk populations. Implication: The review’s findings will guide policy, practice, and research recommendations for enhancing the early identification of people with intellectual disabilities.
  • PublicationOpen Access
    Community/Crisis Cafés: perspectives of service users and carers scoping review
    (Springer, 2025) Ní Dhoibhilín, Neasa; Doody, Owen; Bohan, David; Murphy, Louise
    Community/Crisis Cafés offer an alternative, out-of-hours mental health support by providing a safe, peer/clinician-supported environment for individuals in crisis. These cafés utilise peer support models that draw on personal experience, fostering connections and aiding in crisis management. Despite the growing global implementation of these cafés, limited research exists on how service users and carers experience and benefit from them. This study aims to explore the perspectives of service users and carers on accessing and utilising support through community/crisis cafés both nationally and internationally. A scoping review was guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and included keyword searches of eight databases (Academic Search Complete, APA PsychInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science), combined with grey literature searches of LENSUS, Health Service Executive, WHO Global Index, NHS, and Open Grey. Backward and forward chaining of references was also completed to ensure all literature was sourced. Papers were limited to 2010–2023 and in English. Covidence was used for the screening process, ten papers met the review criteria and are reported as per the PRISMA-ScR checklist and PRISMA flow diagram. The findings of ten papers on service users and carers experiences indicate that Community/Crisis Cafés can have a positive impact on mental health management, alleviate social isolation, and reduce emergency department use. However, challenges such as consistency in service delivery and accessibility were noted. Further research and ongoing evaluation are necessary to fully understand the efficacy and limitations of this alternative co-produced, community mental health service delivery model.