Sound is an integral part of protest, and singing is a way for ordinary people, as well as
amateur or professional musicians, to sonorously raise their voices in an appeal for
justice. The intimate and sensuous activity of singing, in solo form or as part of a
collective, has a power and persuasiveness beyond mere rhetoric. Because of music’s
ubiquity, its presence in all cultures, and its fundamental ownership by all human
beings, it is a medium and a performance act that is essentially recognisable, familiar,
and translatable; therefore, it has the potential to reach across social and political
divides, or, at the very least, reveal our shared humanity. Music, of course, is not
intrinsically good or inherently utopian, even if, in making music – in musiking - people
celebrate not only who they are, but also often who they hope to become (Small 1998:
xi). Like any medium, music can be used for malign propaganda purposes. It can
disinform, it can proselytise, it can incite, and it can exclude; singers, song texts and
performance activities may, in fact, be part of the very systems that reproduce
oppressive structures and behaviours (Turino 2008). But when singing is mobilized in
order to counter injustice, to challenge inequality, to rise above hate and fear, to appeal
against the normalisation of bigotry, racism, misogyny, homophobia, and a myriad of
other anti-democratic, anti-human practices, then the power of song is revealed as
affective, persuasive, ethical and hopeful.
History
Publication
Songs of Social Protest International Perspectives Dillane, Aileen, Power, Martin J, Devereux, Eoin, Haynes, Amanda (eds);